Suspended Bharatiya Janata Party MP Kirti Azad on Wednesday targeted
more politicians, including party MP and BCCI secretary Anurag Thakur,
involved in cricket governance and claimed the Serious Fraud
Investigation Office (SFIO) probe report had recommended “prosecution”
of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in the DDCA affairs.
He also appeared to support Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s
allegation that a DDCA official had sought sexual favours from a woman
if she wanted her son to be part of its cricket team, saying he had
raised a similar issue in 2007.
At a press conference, Mr. Azad quoted from the report of the SFIO and
claimed that it had recommended “prosecution” of Mr. Jaitley among
others but it has not been done in the last three years.
“Under the Companies Act, 1956, all the directors were to be assigned
particular roles and if they are not, then the term [for action against
them] is compounding. Twenty-seven executive members, including Jaitley,
were not assigned any role. Twenty-four of them, including Jaitley did
not compound.”
“So SFIO recommended that under Section 5 G of the Companies Act, the
Registrar of Companies should prosecute them for not compounding. It
shows the BCCI is above law. It has been three years since the
recommendation but they have not been prosecuted,” he said.
When questioned on who the politicians were, he named Mr. Jaitley, Mr.
Thakur, Rajeev Shukla, Jyotiraditya Scindia, Farooq Abdullah and Praful
Patel.
All of them were then, and most still are, involved in cricket
administration except Mr. Patel, who is All India Football Federation
President.
Referring to Mr. Thakur, the three-time MP from Darbhagna, he said, “You
cannot wear two caps. This is a conflict of interest. Either you are in
Parliament or you are associated with a sports association.”
Mr. Azad told a press conference that the CBI had written to the DDCA on
December 12, seeking its audit report between 2013-14 and alleged that
such tactics were meant to delay the inquiry.
Mr. Jaitley and the DDCA have denied his charges.
The BJP has charged him with “anti-party activities” over his consistent
attack on Mr. Jaitley over the alleged financial irregularities in the
cricket body.
No comments:
Post a Comment